[Mristudio-users] Theory_Air

susumu mori susumu at mri.jhu.edu
Thu May 26 10:29:55 EDT 2011


Thank you for the report. We'll look into the issue.

On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Castaneda, Salvador
<salvador.castaneda at med.uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
> Hey jacquie,
>
> I had the exact same issue when i started using it. What i did was export the all the maps i was measuring (FA, RD, ADC..) as analyze files. Then i used another software, in my case Pmod, and then uploaded all the files. The files have the same header and so they are already coregistered, you only have to ( i prefer) manually coregister them to an anatomy. Then i drew the rois there. ROI editor from the dti studio software is also good, but i found it hard to coregister the anatomy there. I think i'm not properly qualified to give you an answer about the tracts, so i leave it to someone else to answer that, but i would first look at the shimming you are performing on the region you are studying, and then i would guess there is going to be variability in the tracts that should average out with many samples, i think the averages should only help... Maybe the seeding of the tracts?
> Best,
>
> Salvador
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Salvador Castaneda, MD.
> University of Tübingen - Department of Radiology
> Röntgenweg 13
> 72076 Tübingen
> Germany
>
> Office:      +49 (7071) 29-82977
> Fax:          +49 (7071) 29-4451
> E-mail:     Salvador.Castaneda at med.uni.tuebingen.de
> Web:         www.preclinicalimaging.org
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: mristudio-users-bounces at mristudio.org [mailto:mristudio-users-bounces at mristudio.org] Im Auftrag von Jacquie Hodge
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. Mai 2011 22:21
> An: mristudio-users at mristudio.org
> Betreff: [Mristudio-users] Theory_Air
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I receive my DTI images as 6 directions with 6 repeats. Today I tried the Theory_Air registration on a set that I have already done many analysis on and I found that although the fiber statistics stayed generally similar when doing tractography, the FA values were quite different for the tracts.. From an average of 0.55 to 0.41 when I did the Theory_Air.
> Can someone explain why for me? Should I not be using this with 6 repeats?
> What I really would like to do is co-register one of my nice anatomical images with the FA or color FA for more accurate placement of my ROI's.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jacquie
>
> Jacquie Hodge MSc candidate in Neuroscience, BSc
> Neuroscience, University of Calgary
> Research Assistant, Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program
> Alberta Children's Hospital
> 2888 Shaganappi Trail NW, Calgary, AB, Canada T3B 6A8
> Phone: 403-955-7733 Fax: 403-955-2922
> jacquie.hodge at albertahealthservices.ca
> Program website: www.perinatalstroke.com
>
> This message and any attached documents are only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential and may contain privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, retransmission, or other disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately, and then delete the original message. Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> mristudio-users mailing list
> mristudio-users at mristudio.org
> http://lists.mristudio.org/mailman/listinfo/
> Unsubscribe, send a blank email to: mristudio-users-unsubscribe at mristudio.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> mristudio-users mailing list
> mristudio-users at mristudio.org
> http://lists.mristudio.org/mailman/listinfo/
> Unsubscribe, send a blank email to: mristudio-users-unsubscribe at mristudio.org
>
>



More information about the mristudio-users mailing list