[Mristudio-users] DTI method: VBA, MRIstudio vs. TBSS

[lion gao]

Yeah, New technique, fact, idea,etc. whatever, new things are eye-catching
and can even generate new papers ~Joke- thank for your idea :)

On 13 May 2010 22:44, Longmm <miaomiaolong at 126.com> wrote:

> actually, the most amazing part of a good research is new techniqe, or
> fact, or idea from an well established traditional stable experiment or
> design , or facts.
>
> 在2010-05-13 20:07:52，"lion gao" <gaolion at gmail.com> 写道：
>
>  Dear Experts,
>
>
>
> I have one part of my thesis on DTI data analysis. The method I used is the
> voxel-based analysis (VBA) and I tried MRIstudio as well. One of the
> examiners pointed out that track-based spatial statistics (TBSS), as a state
> of art way, should have been considered.
>
>
> I am familiar with TBSS, only know that it may reduce systemic
> mis-registration inVBA and increasing papers published with the method. I am
> not sure whether:
> 1. VBA has become “out of date”,
> 2. and TBSS has become a “golden standard” for DTI data analysis.
>
> Can someone help to justify the situation or defense a little bit? Thank
> you very much in advance!
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Gao
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> 网易为中小企业免费提供企业邮箱（自主域名） <http://ym.163.com/?from=od3>
> _______________________________________________
> Mristudio-users mailing list
> Mristudio-users at mristudio.org
> http://lists.mristudio.org/mailman/listinfo/
> Unsubscribe, send a blank email to:
> Mristudio-users-unsubscribe at mristudio.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mristudio.org/pipermail/mristudio-users/attachments/20100515/26feb93a/attachment.html