[Mristudio-users] DTI protocol (resending using my registered email)

Pom Sailasuta pom4pom at gmail.com
Wed Apr 7 23:38:31 EDT 2010


thank you, Dr. Susumu. I will give it a try.

Pom

On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:25 PM, susumu mori <susumu at mri.jhu.edu> wrote:

> Here is what I would do;
>
> 1) resolution: 2-2.2mm isotropic. The latest RF coils are good enough to
> deliver 2mm resolution with decent SNR. The smaller the image matrix, the
> less distortion and higher SNR.
> 2.2mm: 112x112 matrix (zerofilled (interpolated) to 224x224 or 256x256) for
> 246x246 mm FOV or 96x96 (->192x192 or 256x256) for 211x211 mm FOV. 2.2 mm
> slice
>
> 2mm: 112x112 matrix for 224x224 mm FOV. 96x96 for 192x192mm FOV could be
> too small for some subjects. 2mm slice
>
> 2) the total number of DWIs: We do about 60 DWIs which should take 8-9 min.
> 30 DWI could provide decent SNR with 2.2 mm but a bit push for 2mm. 60 DWIs
> mean; 30 orientation x 2, 20 x 3, 15 x 4, 12 x 5. In my opinion, they
> provide very similar results but some reviewers believe the more
> orientations the better. With simulation or extremely high SNR data (e.g.
> >30 min scan), you start to see slight differences among these schemes but
> with <10 min scan, they are usually indistinguishable. Add 5-6 b0 images.
>
> 3) TR: decided by the number of slices. Choose the shortest. Philips and
> Siemens should be in 6-10s range. Old GE may have >10s due to a gradient
> duty cycle issue.
>
> 4) TE: shortest. Siemens and GE should use double-echo type option (default
> for Siemens and option for GE). Philips users may want to add few ms, which
> would shorten the scan time drastically and reduce Eddy-current distortion.
> Systematically increase the TE until you reach the shortest scan time. The
> shortest TE often leads to longer scan time due to gradient duty cycle.
>
> 5) SENSE/GRAPPA/ASSET: On, factor = 2 - 2.5. Latest 32-channel head coil
> could push to 3 but check the image quality before you decide to use.
>
> 6) Partial fourier: I prefer 100% and I feel the image is more robust
> against motion, but this is just my subjective experience. Many use 70-80%,
> which may improve SNR by using shorter TE.
>
> Susumu
>
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Pom Sailasuta <sailasuta at hmri.org> wrote:
>
>> Dear Dr. Susumu,
>>
>> I am looking for recommended DTI scanning protocol on a 3T Philips Achieva
>> scanner with 8-ch SENSE head coil. Can you point me to the location where I
>> can find it?
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> Napapon
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mristudio-users mailing list
>> Mristudio-users at mristudio.org
>> http://lists.mristudio.org/mailman/listinfo/
>> Unsubscribe, send a blank email to:
>> Mristudio-users-unsubscribe at mristudio.org
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mristudio-users mailing list
> Mristudio-users at mristudio.org
> http://lists.mristudio.org/mailman/listinfo/
> Unsubscribe, send a blank email to:
> Mristudio-users-unsubscribe at mristudio.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mristudio.org/pipermail/mristudio-users/attachments/20100407/1614e124/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the Mristudio-users mailing list