<div dir="ltr">Hello Dr. Mori<div>I was wondering what happen with your neuroapps for Ipad</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2013/11/15 Shaimaa Abdelsattar <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:shaimaa96@hotmail.com" target="_blank">shaimaa96@hotmail.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div><span></span></div><div><div style="text-align:left;direction:ltr">Hello Dr.Mori, </div><div style="text-align:left;direction:ltr">
I tried affine transformation and trilinear interpolation</div><div style="text-align:left;direction:ltr">How can i include scaling in my linear transformation ? </div><div style="text-align:left;direction:ltr"><br></div>
<div style="text-align:left;direction:ltr">Thanks</div><div><div class="h5"><div style="text-align:left;direction:ltr"><br></div><div><br>On Nov 14, 2013, at 4:10 PM, "Susumu Mori" <<a href="mailto:smoriw@gmail.com" target="_blank">smoriw@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr">Hi Shaimaa,<div><br></div><div>When you apply the linear registration, did you use 9 or 12-mode, which includes scaling?</div><div>ICBM-152 template brain is larger than many subjects. So, your linear transformation better include scaling. </div>
<div><br></div><div>Usually the parcellation map superimpose pretty well.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Shaimaa Abdelsattar <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:shaimaa96@hotmail.com" target="_blank">shaimaa96@hotmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi experts,<br>
I have question about image registration. I have used ICBM_DTI_81 atlas for image registration in my case, control clinical research using linear transformation. After doing this i found good registration after i tested structures by the landmark option. Yet when i applied their ROI file (WMPM 90%) on my data, I found that the ROIs in the atlas are larger than the actual size of structures of my patients. Is there any solution for this?<br>
<br>
Or i should use other atlas for my registration<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
Shaimaa<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
mristudio-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:mristudio-users@mristudio.org" target="_blank">mristudio-users@mristudio.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.mristudio.org/mailman/listinfo/" target="_blank">http://lists.mristudio.org/mailman/listinfo/</a><br>
Unsubscribe, send a blank email to: <a href="mailto:mristudio-users-unsubscribe@mristudio.org" target="_blank">mristudio-users-unsubscribe@mristudio.org</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>mristudio-users mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:mristudio-users@mristudio.org" target="_blank">mristudio-users@mristudio.org</a></span><br>
<span><a href="http://lists.mristudio.org/mailman/listinfo/" target="_blank">http://lists.mristudio.org/mailman/listinfo/</a></span><br><span>Unsubscribe, send a blank email to: <a href="mailto:mristudio-users-unsubscribe@mristudio.org" target="_blank">mristudio-users-unsubscribe@mristudio.org</a></span><br>
</div></blockquote></div></div></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
mristudio-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:mristudio-users@mristudio.org">mristudio-users@mristudio.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.mristudio.org/mailman/listinfo/" target="_blank">http://lists.mristudio.org/mailman/listinfo/</a><br>
Unsubscribe, send a blank email to: <a href="mailto:mristudio-users-unsubscribe@mristudio.org">mristudio-users-unsubscribe@mristudio.org</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>