<div dir="ltr">Hi Shaimaa,<div><br></div><div>When you apply the linear registration, did you use 9 or 12-mode, which includes scaling?</div><div>ICBM-152 template brain is larger than many subjects. So, your linear transformation better include scaling. </div>
<div><br></div><div>Usually the parcellation map superimpose pretty well.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Shaimaa Abdelsattar <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:shaimaa96@hotmail.com" target="_blank">shaimaa96@hotmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi experts,<br>
I have question about image registration. I have used ICBM_DTI_81 atlas for image registration in my case, control clinical research using linear transformation. After doing this i found good registration after i tested structures by the landmark option. Yet when i applied their ROI file (WMPM 90%) on my data, I found that the ROIs in the atlas are larger than the actual size of structures of my patients. Is there any solution for this?<br>
<br>
Or i should use other atlas for my registration<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
Shaimaa<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
mristudio-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:mristudio-users@mristudio.org">mristudio-users@mristudio.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.mristudio.org/mailman/listinfo/" target="_blank">http://lists.mristudio.org/mailman/listinfo/</a><br>
Unsubscribe, send a blank email to: <a href="mailto:mristudio-users-unsubscribe@mristudio.org">mristudio-users-unsubscribe@mristudio.org</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>