Good question. Slice-by-Slice rejection should be done after co-registration. <div>If there is a severely corrupted slice, the corruption could propagate to adjacent slices if the postprocessing co-registration involves through-plane rotation. There is not much you can do about it. </div>
<div>In this respect, I think pixel-by-pixel rejection could be a more versatile approach.</div><div>My lab is moving to pixel rejection, not slice rejection.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Dorian P. <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:alb.net@gmail.com" target="_blank">alb.net@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi all,<div><br></div><div>In DTIstudio, when some slices are flagged as bad, are they considered for error calculation during realignment or are they ignored.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Thank you.</div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div>Dorian</div>
</font></span><br>_______________________________________________<br>
mristudio-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:mristudio-users@mristudio.org">mristudio-users@mristudio.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.mristudio.org/mailman/listinfo/" target="_blank">http://lists.mristudio.org/mailman/listinfo/</a><br>
Unsubscribe, send a blank email to: <a href="mailto:mristudio-users-unsubscribe@mristudio.org">mristudio-users-unsubscribe@mristudio.org</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>