<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt">might it be Overplus off (1st) vs. Overplus on (2nd one)?<br>thanks,<br>bruce<br><br><div><br></div><div style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;"><br><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;"><font face="Tahoma" size="2"><hr size="1"><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">From:</span></b> 黄海清 <basketballmouse@163.com><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> DTI Studio <mristudio-users@mristudio.org><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Tue, September 14, 2010 9:04:10 AM<br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> [Mristudio-users] Different Gradient Table of DTI from Philips Achieva 3T<br></font><br>
Hi,<br><br>I'm dealing with DTI data from Philips Achieva 3T. I tried two methods to compute the gradient table (32+1).<br>(1) " dcm2nii.exe " with Philips dicom files<br>         0         0         0<br>    1.0000         0         0<br>         0   -1.0000         0<br>         0         0   -1.0000<br>   -0.0424    0.1146    0.9925<br>    0.1749    0.2005    0.9640<br>    0.2323    0.1626    0.9590<br>   
 0.3675   -0.0261    0.9296<br>    0.1902   -0.3744    0.9076<br>   -0.1168   -0.8334    0.5402<br>   -0.2005   -0.2527    0.9465<br>   -0.4958   -0.1345    0.8580<br>   -0.0141    0.6281    0.7780<br>   -0.7445    0.1477    0.6511<br>   -0.7609   -0.3204    0.5643<br>   -0.1809   -0.9247    0.3351<br>   -0.6796    0.4224    0.5997<br>    0.7771   -0.4707    0.4178<br>    0.9242    0.1036    0.3677<br>    0.4685    0.7674    0.4378<br>   
 0.8817    0.1893    0.4322<br>    0.6904   -0.7062    0.1569<br>    0.2391   -0.7571    0.6080<br>   -0.0578   -0.9837   -0.1703<br>   -0.5368   -0.8361    0.1135<br>   -0.9918    0.1207    0.0423<br>   -0.9968   -0.0709    0.0379<br>   -0.8724   -0.4781    0.1014<br>   -0.2487   -0.9336   -0.2581<br>    0.1183   -0.9919    0.0471<br>    0.3376   -0.8415   -0.4218<br>    0.5286   -0.8409   -0.1163<br>    0.9969   -0.0550    0.0571<br>(2) " DTI_gradient_table_creator_Philips_RelX.m " with Philips
 par/rec files<br>   -0.6533   -0.2706   -0.7071<br>   -0.2087   -0.6756   -0.7071<br>    0.0197   -0.7068   -0.7071<br>    0.4212   -0.5679   -0.7071<br>    0.6899   -0.1549   -0.7071<br>   -0.6535   -0.2707   -0.7069<br>   -0.5000   -0.5000   -0.7071<br>   -0.2929   -0.7071   -0.6436<br>    0.2945   -0.7064   -0.6436<br>    0.5150   -0.4861   -0.7061<br>    0.7071   -0.2929   -0.6436<br>   -0.7071   -0.4725   -0.5261<br>   -0.4725   -0.7071   -0.5261<br>    0.5555   -0.6439   -0.5261<br>   
 0.7071   -0.4725   -0.5261<br>   -0.7071   -0.7071   -0.0002<br>    0.7071   -0.7071         0<br>   -0.7071   -0.4725    0.5261<br>    0.7071   -0.4725    0.5261<br>    0.4725   -0.7071    0.5261<br>    0.7071   -0.4725    0.5261<br>   -0.6364   -0.4252    0.6436<br>   -0.7060   -0.7060    0.0547<br>   -0.2929   -0.7071    0.6436<br>    0.2929   -0.7071    0.6436<br>    0.7071   -0.7071    0.0078<br>    0.7071   -0.2929    0.6436<br>   -0.5847  
 -0.3977    0.7071<br>   -0.7063   -0.7063    0.0489<br>    0.0347   -0.7063    0.7071<br>    0.7071   -0.7071    0.0115<br>    0.7071         0    0.7071<br>         0         0         0<br>  100.0000  100.0000  100.0000<br>They seem totally different. So can any person explain this problem? Thank you very much!<br><br>Haiqing<br><br><br><span title="neteasefooter"><span id="netease_mail_footer"><hr>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://yxp.163.com/photo/ep.html?sss=fromyx0911">全国最低价,天天在家冲照片,24小时发货上门!</a>
</span></span></div></div>
</div><br>
      </body></html>