<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Calibri">Hi, Josselin,</font></p>
<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Calibri">Usually air can correct the angle differences. If your results are not good, try a rigid transformation before air (mutual has been done a good job). </font></div>
<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Calibri">best,</font></div>
<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Calibri"></font> </div>
<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Calibri">Andreia</font></div><br><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Josselin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:j.houenou@yahoo.fr">j.houenou@yahoo.fr</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class="gmail_quote">Hi,<br>I am doing acquisitions in a non AC/PC referential (generally slightly oblique to AC/PC).<br>Do you think that I need to transform my FA/b0 images in a AC/PC referential ? Or is AIR sufficient ?<br>
thanks,<br>Josselin<br><br><br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>mristudio-users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:mristudio-users@mristudio.org">mristudio-users@mristudio.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.mristudio.org/mailman/listinfo/" target="_blank">http://lists.mristudio.org/mailman/listinfo/</a><br>
Unsubscribe, send a blank email to: <a href="mailto:mristudio-users-unsubscribe@mristudio.org">mristudio-users-unsubscribe@mristudio.org</a><br></blockquote></div><br>