<div>Thanks a lot, Anthony and Xin. Now all my md5sum numbers match with your updated list, :)</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Cheers,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Jim<br><br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 4:20 PM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:akolasny@jhu.edu">akolasny@jhu.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Thanks for pointing this out.<br><br>I reran 'md5sum' on all the binaries. When the new beta<br>software was included, we forgot to update the MD5SUM file.<br>
<br>The 'latest' binaries are symbolically linked to the latest version.<br>So, 'latest' binaries will change when new binaries are made available.<br><br>Sorry,<br>Anthony<br>
<div>
<div></div>
<div class="Wj3C7c"><br>> Jim,<br>><br>> Sorry, I misunderstood you. Yes, it should be ".rar" not ".zip" on the<br>> MD5SUM webpage.<br>><br>> I have sent your message to Anthony. He will give you some help.<br>
><br>><br>> Regards,<br>><br>> Xin<br>><br>><br>> ----- Original Message -----<br>> From: Jim Li <<a href="mailto:megjim1@gmail.com">megjim1@gmail.com</a>><br>> Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 2:32 pm<br>
> Subject: [Mristudio-users] about md5sum mismatch<br>> To: <a href="mailto:mristudio-users@mristudio.org">mristudio-users@mristudio.org</a><br>><br>><br>>> Hello,<br>>><br>>> I tried several different ways to download the<br>
>> "Landmarker-latest-x86.zip<>"<br>>> file from MRIstudio. But my md5sum result is always<br>>> 17dc03ddc049cd583972828eee3830cd, which is quite different from what's<br>>> listed in the MRI studio website.<br>
>><br>>> Same thing happened to my<br>>> "ROIEditor-latest-x86.rar<>"<br>>> whose md5sum didn't match the listed "2476773da50af97072589243d1bdbf89<br>>> ROIEditor-latest-x86.zip" (Shouldn't it be ".rar" instead of ".zip"?).<br>
>> However, my md5sum agrees with the listed value on the website for<br>>> "vcredist_x86.exe" and "DtiStudio-latest-x86.exe".<br>>><br>>> I guess that means a corrupted download for the first two files, but<br>
>> not for<br>>> the last two, which seems weird. Anyway, could anybody suggest a<br>>> reliable<br>>> way to correctly download the first two files?<br>>> Thanks,<br>>><br>>> Jim<br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>>> Mristudio-users mailing list<br>>> <a href="mailto:Mristudio-users@mristudio.org">Mristudio-users@mristudio.org</a><br>>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>
> Mristudio-users mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:Mristudio-users@mristudio.org">Mristudio-users@mristudio.org</a><br>> <a href="http://lists.mristudio.org/mailman/listinfo/mristudio-users" target="_blank">http://lists.mristudio.org/mailman/listinfo/mristudio-users</a><br>
><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Mristudio-users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Mristudio-users@mristudio.org">Mristudio-users@mristudio.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.mristudio.org/mailman/listinfo/mristudio-users" target="_blank">http://lists.mristudio.org/mailman/listinfo/mristudio-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>