<div dir="ltr">Dear DTIstudio users,<br>
<br>
I wonder if you have gradient tables for Philips Achieva system.<br>
<br>
>From a source I have a gradient table for low resolution as follows:<br>
<br>
0:1.0000,        0.0000,        0.0000<br id="u3ia">
1:0.0000,        1.0000,        0.0000<br id="u3ia0">
2:0.0000,        0.0000,        1.0000<br id="u3ia1">
3:-0.7044,        -0.0881,        -0.7044<br id="u3ia2">
4:0.7044,        0.7044,        0.0881<br id="u3ia3">
5:0.0881,        0.7044,        0.7044<br id="u3ia4">
6:0.0000, 0.0000, 0.0000<br><br><br>For medium,<br><br>0: 0.7071        -0.7071        1.00<br id="uo8j">
1: 0.7071        -0.7071        -1.00<br id="uo8j0">
2: 1.0000         1.0000         0.0000<br id="uo8j1">
3: 0.9999        -0.1561        0.9879<br id="uo8j2">
4: 0.9894        0.4091        0.9240<br id="uo8j3">
5: 0.4674        0.8874        0.9970<br id="uo8j4">
6: 0.3866        0.9297        0.9930<br id="uo8j5">
7: 0.7667        -0.9511        0.7124<br id="uo8j6">
8: 0.6945        0.9954        -0.7295<br id="uo8j7">
9: 0.3580        -0.9800        -0.9547<br id="uo8j8">
10: 1.0000        -0.9992        -0.0392<br id="uo8j9">
11: 0.9999        -0.3989        -0.9171<br id="uo8j10">
12: 0.9923        0.4082        -0.9213<br id="uo8j11">
13: 0.9989        0.9982        -0.0759<br id="uo8j12">
14: 0.2899        0.9919        -0.9655<br id="uo8j13">
15: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000<br><br><br>For high,<br><br> 0: 1.000, 0.000, 0.000<br id="fc0h2"> 1: 0.000, 1.000, 0.000<br id="fc0h3"> 2: 0.000, 0.000, 1.000<br id="fc0h4"> 3: -0.042, -0.115, -0.993<br id="fc0h5"> 4: 0.175, -0.200, -0.964<br id="fc0h6">
5: 0.232, -0.163, -0.959<br id="fc0h7"> 6: 0.368, 0.026, -0.930<br id="fc0h8"> 7: 0.190, 0.374, -0.908<br id="fc0h9"> 8: -0.117, 0.833, -0.540<br id="fc0h10"> 9: -0.200, 0.253, -0.947<br id="fc0h11"> 10: -0.496, 0.134, -0.858<br id="fc0h12">
11: -0.014, -0.628, -0.778<br id="fc0h13"> 12: -0.744, -0.148, -0.651<br id="fc0h14"> 13: -0.761, 0.320, -0.564<br id="fc0h15"> 14: -0.181, 0.925, -0.335<br id="fc0h16"> 15: -0.680, -0.422, -0.600<br id="fc0h17"> 16: 0.777, 0.471, -0.418<br id="fc0h18">
17: 0.924, -0.104, -0.368<br id="fc0h19"> 18: 0.468, -0.767, -0.438<br id="fc0h20"> 19: 0.882, -0.189, -0.432<br id="fc0h21"> 20: 0.690, 0.706, -0.157<br id="fc0h22"> 21: 0.239, 0.757, -0.608<br id="fc0h23"> 22: -0.058, 0.984, 0.170<br id="fc0h24">
23: -0.537, 0.836, -0.113<br id="fc0h25"> 24: -0.992, -0.121, -0.042<br id="fc0h26"> 25: -0.997, 0.071, -0.038<br id="fc0h27"> 26: -0.872, 0.478, -0.101<br id="fc0h28"> 27: -0.249, 0.933, 0.258<br id="fc0h29"> 28: 0.118, 0.992, -0.047<br id="fc0h30">
29: 0.338, 0.841, 0.422<br id="fc0h31"> 30: 0.529, 0.841, 0.116<br id="fc0h32"> 31: 0.997, 0.055, -0.057<br id="fc0h33"> 32: 0.000, 0.000, 0.000<br id="fc0h34"><br><br>
I wonder if the tables above are correct or not. Is there anything incorrect or partially incomplete, please let me know.<br>Thanks in advance.<br>
<br>
Sincerely,<br>
Seongjin </div>