[Mristudio-users] Philips gradient tables
susumu
susumu at mri.jhu.edu
Fri Jul 25 07:12:32 EDT 2008
Seongjin,
In Philips, there are 3 types (low: 6, medium: 15, high: 32) x 2 (overplus
on/off) = 6 gradient tables.
The "gradient overplus = on" always use at least two gradients to enhance b
efficiency and therefore gaining several millisecond of echo time. In your
example, the low and high is "overplus = off" and the medium is "overplus =
on". You can see "1, 0, 0" in the first two but not in the medium.
The medium with "overplus = off" should look like;
0: 0, 0, 0
1: 1, 0, 0
2: 0, 1, 0
3: 0, 0, 1
4: -0.0424,-0.1146,-0.9925
5: 0.1749,-0.2005,-0.9639
6: 0.2323,-0.1626,-0.9590
7: 0.3675,0.0261,-0.9296
8: 0.1902,0.3744,-0.9076
9: -0.1168,0.8334,-0.5402
10: -0.2005,0.2527,-0.9466
11: -0.4958,0.1345,-0.8580
12: -0.0141,-0.6281,-0.7780
13: -0.7445,-0.1477,-0.6511
14: -0.7609,0.3204,-0.5643
15: -0.1809,0.9247,-0.33510
16: -0.6796,-0.4224,-0.5997
17: 0.7771,0.4707,-0.4178
18: 0.9242,-0.1036,-0.3677
19: 0.4685,-0.7674,-0.4378
20: 0.8817,-0.1893,-0.4322
21: 0.6904,0.7062,-0.1569
22: 0.2391,0.7571,-0.6080
23: -0.0578,0.9837,0.1703
24: -0.5368,0.8361,-0.1135
25: -0.9918,-0.1207,-0.0423
26: -0.9968,0.0709,-0.0379
27: -0.8724,0.4781,-0.1014
28: -0.2487,0.9335,0.2581
29: 0.1183,0.9919,-0.0471
30: 0.3376,0.8415,0.4218
31: 0.5286,0.8409,0.1163
32: 0.9969,0.0550,-0.0571
In general, I do not recommend to user "overplus = on", because tensor
calculation get complicated when oblique planes are used. You have to
recalculate the table based on the image angles.
Also, please note that the "0, 0, 0" could be the first or the last image
depending on how you specify the output files.
Susumu
_____
From: mristudio-users-bounces at mristudio.org
[mailto:mristudio-users-bounces at mristudio.org] On Behalf Of [Seongjin]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 3:47 PM
To: DTI Studio, ROI Editor, Landmarker Questions/Support
Subject: [Mristudio-users] Philips gradient tables
Dear DTIstudio users,
I wonder if you have gradient tables for Philips Achieva system.
>From a source I have a gradient table for low resolution as follows:
0:1.0000, 0.0000, 0.0000
1:0.0000, 1.0000, 0.0000
2:0.0000, 0.0000, 1.0000
3:-0.7044, -0.0881, -0.7044
4:0.7044, 0.7044, 0.0881
5:0.0881, 0.7044, 0.7044
6:0.0000, 0.0000, 0.0000
For medium,
0: 0.7071 -0.7071 1.00
1: 0.7071 -0.7071 -1.00
2: 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000
3: 0.9999 -0.1561 0.9879
4: 0.9894 0.4091 0.9240
5: 0.4674 0.8874 0.9970
6: 0.3866 0.9297 0.9930
7: 0.7667 -0.9511 0.7124
8: 0.6945 0.9954 -0.7295
9: 0.3580 -0.9800 -0.9547
10: 1.0000 -0.9992 -0.0392
11: 0.9999 -0.3989 -0.9171
12: 0.9923 0.4082 -0.9213
13: 0.9989 0.9982 -0.0759
14: 0.2899 0.9919 -0.9655
15: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
For high,
0: 1.000, 0.000, 0.000
1: 0.000, 1.000, 0.000
2: 0.000, 0.000, 1.000
3: -0.042, -0.115, -0.993
4: 0.175, -0.200, -0.964
5: 0.232, -0.163, -0.959
6: 0.368, 0.026, -0.930
7: 0.190, 0.374, -0.908
8: -0.117, 0.833, -0.540
9: -0.200, 0.253, -0.947
10: -0.496, 0.134, -0.858
11: -0.014, -0.628, -0.778
12: -0.744, -0.148, -0.651
13: -0.761, 0.320, -0.564
14: -0.181, 0.925, -0.335
15: -0.680, -0.422, -0.600
16: 0.777, 0.471, -0.418
17: 0.924, -0.104, -0.368
18: 0.468, -0.767, -0.438
19: 0.882, -0.189, -0.432
20: 0.690, 0.706, -0.157
21: 0.239, 0.757, -0.608
22: -0.058, 0.984, 0.170
23: -0.537, 0.836, -0.113
24: -0.992, -0.121, -0.042
25: -0.997, 0.071, -0.038
26: -0.872, 0.478, -0.101
27: -0.249, 0.933, 0.258
28: 0.118, 0.992, -0.047
29: 0.338, 0.841, 0.422
30: 0.529, 0.841, 0.116
31: 0.997, 0.055, -0.057
32: 0.000, 0.000, 0.000
I wonder if the tables above are correct or not. Is there anything incorrect
or partially incomplete, please let me know.
Thanks in advance.
Sincerely,
Seongjin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mristudio.org/pipermail/mristudio-users/attachments/20080725/d057c875/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Mristudio-users
mailing list